MEDIA STATEMENT BY SA CANEGROWERS
September 21, 2026
South Africa’s retailers and food and beverage manufacturers previously made a promise: to buy sugar produced in South Africa. But an analysis of data on local sugar sales, and evidence on local retail shelves shows that they are not delivering on this commitment, at the expense of South African livelihoods.
Under the Sugarcane Value Chain Master Plan, an agreement initiated by the South African government, retailers and manufacturers committed to sourcing 95% of their sugar from South Africa. The Master Plan is a formal compact between local industry, end users, labour, and government, brokered by the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition. Its aim is to protect South African jobs, ensure equitable access to the local sugar industry, and secure South African production capacity. When companies signed it, they signed up to buy South African sugar, not sugar produced in neighbouring countries, such as Eswatini.
“Local means South African,” said Higgins Mdluli, chairman of SA Canegrowers.
Data from the local sugar industry shows a 20% collapse in local sugar sales when compared over the same period of time in the previous three seasons: sales dropped from 626 417 tons in 2023/24 to 433 380 tons this season alone, despite there being more than sufficient locally produced sugar to meet domestic demand. SA Canegrowers have spent the past years raising the alarming displacement of locally grown sugar with heavily subsidised imported sugar, especially at retailers.
“When retailers signed the Master Plan, they didn’t commit to only avoiding deep-sea imports from countries such as India, Brazil and Thailand. They committed to supporting South African sugar, South African jobs and South African transformation. You cannot honour that commitment by sourcing sugar from outside our borders of our country and simply arguing it doesn’t count as an import because it comes from a neighbouring country with no import tariff. The local communities who depend on this industry don’t experience the difference, the money still leaves South Africa, and local livelihoods still suffer,” said Mdluli.
Sugar produced in countries like eSwatini can enter South Africa without incurring an import tariff, as the countries are part of the Southern African Customs Union, a free-trade area. However, by stocking and selling sugar from this country, retailers are supporting jobs in neighbouring countries, whilst local growers in Mpumalanga and KwaZulu-Natal face losing income due to reduced sales. Cross-border sugar sales also don’t contribute to local transformation efforts, rural development, customer rebates and do not participate in efforts to increase import tariffs and reduce the sugar tax, yet they receive all the benefits. By buying sugar from eSwatini, one is directly undermining efforts to ensure the sustainability of the South African sugar growing and milling industry.
“South Africa produces enough sugar to meet local demand. Retailers who sell sugar produced in other countries are exporting jobs and not sticking to their own commitment to support local sugar: a commitment made in South Africa, under a plan by the South African government, to South African sugar,” said Mdluli.
ENDS
For media enquiries:
Gerhard Mulder
gerhard@resolvecommunications.
083 305 9361